African Americans May Utilize Hospice Less Due to Eligibility Criteria
The researchers theorized that if disparities in hospice use were the result of preference for aggressive treatment among African Americans, then their rates of hospice use could be increased by redesigning hospice eligibility criteria. Conversely, if African Americans were less likely to want hospice services, then changes to the benefit may not be necessary, but modifications to the services that are offered may be warranted.
Dr. Casarett's team found that African-American patients had stronger preferences for continuing their cancer treatments as well as greater perceived needs for hospice services. The greater perceived need for hospice services among African Americans was attributed largely to differences in self-reported finances—poorer patients wanted more services.
"These findings suggest that the hospice eligibility criteria of Medicare and other insurers requiring patients to give up cancer treatment contribute to racial disparities in hospice use," the authors wrote. "Moreover, these criteria do not select those patients with the greatest needs for hospice services," they added.
The basis for these disparities is likely related to both cultural differences and economic characteristics. The results from this study indicate that hospice access could be made fairer by using eligibility criteria that are more directly need-based. For example, the investigators suggested that eligibility might be determined by assessing needs for specific hospice services such as pain or symptom management.
View more coverage of the study from HealthDay News and Reuters Health.
HFA is holding its nationally broadcast teleconference on Diversity and End-of-Life Care on April 29, 2009. Below is an excerpt from a chapter in the teleconference’s companion book by Richard B. Fife on “Diversity and Access to Hospice Care.” Fife is a United Methodist minister, president/CEO of the Foundation for End-of-Life Care, and a founding and sustaining member of the Duke Institute for Care at the End of Life.
For several years, I chaired the corporate ethics committee for VITAS Healthcare. In 2003, I asked a member of the committee---Dr. Richard Payne, director of the Duke Institute for Care at the End of Life---to give a thorough and firsthand report on barriers to hospice care for African Americans. Payne began by telling a story of his experience at M. D. Anderson Research Hospital in Houston, where, at the time, he was one of two African-American physicians on staff. He suggested palliative care to a black man dying of cancer, who responded by asking him if he talked with all of his patients about this. Payne went on to say that this patient, like most African Americans, was extremely resistant to hospice and to what Payne considered to be a painless and dignified death. He said that blacks were twice as likely to request life-sustaining treatment as whites and much more resistant to making advance directives. He said hospice was seen by African Americans as giving up hope. One of the reasons his black patient would not listen to him was a widespread mistrust of the medical establishment by African Americans. Payne cited statistics illustrating that many African Americans do not have access to good medical care and that years of neglect, abuse, and discrimination by the medical establishment have taken their toll. According to Dr. Payne, “The medical community’s long, sorry history of racism and unethical behavior toward African Americans must be acknowledged and corrected” (Payne, 2000).
Fife goes on to offer some insight on ways to overcome these barriers.
Part of the author’s personal history in overcoming barriers to hospice in the African-American community involved the access program of VITAS Healthcare Corporation, one of the largest hospice providers in the country. One of the more successful VITAS access programs began almost 10 years ago on the Chicago South Side. VITAS made a long-term commitment to the African-American community that dominates that part of Chicago and took a number of steps to break down barriers to hospice access. First, VITAS hired management and interdisciplinary team members who represented the community. To do this, it developed and implemented a culturally specific recruitment plan, provided diversity education, and fostered a philosophy of diversity. It evaluated the care delivery model and modified it as needed. VITAS conducted focus groups with the staff to identify prospective needs in the community. Externally, VITAS conducted focus groups to determine geographically and culturally specific needs. It implemented a community outreach program focused on recruiting religious leaders throughout the community. VITAS held a series of breakfast and dinner meetings and initiated open discussions. It provided educational materials to inform the community about hospice and evaluated these materials to ensure that they reflected cultural diversity.
VITAS directly addressed the issues of trust and cultural concerns by developing programs designed specifically for the community. One of these programs, developed at the Duke Institute for Care at the End of Life, was entitled “Crossing Over Jordan.” It was presented three times in the community by Payne, Dr. Karla Holloway of Duke University, and local religious leaders who were incorporated into the program. Recognizing the importance of the church in the African-American community, VITAS collaborated with Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Project on the Thousand Churches initiative. VITAS hired an African-American liaison person to work with the community and placed a staff member on the Thousand Churches project.
Over time, VITAS developed specific marketing programs that greatly raised its profile with the African-American community. VITAS worked to find common goals of care, looking at the role of spiritual beliefs and practices in decision making and at the role of family and extended family in the community. In a recent report, Sharon R. Latson, Senior Director of Access Initiatives for VITAS, said that the organization has accessed the African- American media to create stronger visibility for hospice in the community; conducted educational workshops on “What is Hospice?” at village halls, libraries, townships, and senior centers; and implemented hospice education in community clinics serving mostly African-American clients. From 2004 to 2008, VITAS saw a 14% increase in the total black average daily census (Latson, 2008).
Labels: culture, end-of-life, hospice and palliative care
.jpg)




